Nobody Knows Anything

Welcome to Diane Patterson's eclectic blog about what strikes her fancy

Trial by Republicans

Posted on May 18, 2005 Written by Diane

Bill Frist’s Northeast political director at the NRSC in 2002, James Tobin, was the guy behind the New Hampshire phone-jamming scandal from that year. (From Josh Marshall: “The state Republican party hired an Idaho company to knock out the phones of the Democratic get-out-the-vote operation on election day by placing hundreds of automated hang-up calls to their phone banks.”)

Well, Tobin was indicted by a grand jury. But, no fair! he cries. The jury was biased against him. Why?

It contained Democrats.

Tobin now says, in motions filed with the court, that his indictment in the case should be thrown out because the grand jury that indicted him included Democrats.

And in line with Tobin’s apparent contention that Republicans now constitute a protected class (will they mind if we call them a ‘discrete and insular minority’?) there’s this …

And if the case does go to trial, Tobin’s lawyers want to question prospective jurors extensively about their politics and their exposure to media reports of the case to root out potential bias.
A proposed questionnaire would ask prospective jurors to disclose their political party, union membership, whether they’ve ever had a bumper sticker on their car and what it said, what Web logs they read and whether they ever watch TV shows such as “West Wing,” CNN’s “Crossfire,” MSNBC’s “Hardball with Chris Matthews,” and “The McLaughlin Group,” which mostly runs on public television stations.

Tobin’s lawyers also want jurors to describe themselves by checking off all that apply: “aggressive, articulate, emotional, entrepreneurial, intelligent, laid back, loyal, naive, perceptive, stubborn, (or) other.”

Federal prosecutors countered that Tobin is required to prove actual bias by the grand jury: He cannot ask judges to assume that Democrats would indict based on their political convictions, anymore than judges can assume Republicans would indict Democrats in violation of their oath to look only at the evidence.

Let’s see: we have a President who will only make public appearances in front of vetted party members, we have lobbyists being forced to hire Republicans if they want work, and we have the administration insisting that telecom representatives going to a conference overseas be Republicans.

And now trial by acceptable political activity.

Just in case you’re wondering where this is headed.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Politics

Search

Recent Comments

  • Nina: I love that you have footnotes for you blog post.
  • John Steve Adler: I reread it now that you are published. I still like it! It’s great to have so many loose...
  • Diane: Holy moly! I haven’t heard the term “tart noir” in a long time! I looooved Lauren...
  • Merz: “My main problem with amateur sleuths is always they’re always such wholesome people. How on Earth do...
  • Diane: 1) I’ll have to give Calibre another try for managing Collections. Do you know of a webpage with good...

Copyright © 2025 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in