November 14, 2008
I’ve had to rediscover shopping lately, because I need some new clothes. I either a)hate the clothes I’ve been wearing and desperately want a new style, b)need new clothes because nothing I have fits at the moment, or c)have discovered a secret need to wear high heels. Okay, I don’t much understand (c) either, but ever since Nina brought over a pair of her Guess for Marciano spiked Mary Janes I’ve been wanting to wear heels like that. Only I have to practice, having been a strictly flats girl up until this point in my life, so I need to start with mid-range heels and work up to 4 1/2 inch spikes.
(She brought over the heels to try on with this dress
which I completely loved and coveted so much I went out and bought this dress

only because the red wasn’t available and because I need some kind of Little Black Dress, right? Now, of course, I need somewhere to wear this dress and whatever shoes I eventually find to go with them. I’ll leave that as an exercise for Darin.)
So I’ve been doing a lot of shopping recently. Or trying to, at any rate. I was completely unable to get into the mall at all last weekend, because of the flood of cars.
Okay, weekends are out. Yesterday I went to Valley Fair first thing in the morning, a Thursday morning, to the best of my knowledge not the first shopping day of the Xmas season or anything. And despite my intention to hand the Nordstrom shoe sellers as much money as I possibly could (at least, as much as one or two or maybe three pairs of good heels would set me back—as I have literally* have not bought anything but running shoes for years, people), I walked out of there empty-handed. Because as soon as one associate helped me, he or she disappeared to wait on the four or five other women on nearby couches buy as many shoes as they possibly could. Yes, several of them were better dressed than I was (see above, “needs new clothes”), but still. I’ve bought lots of shoes at Nordstrom over the years and never been completely ignored before.
Certainly not at eleven in the damn morning.
I finally went up to the lingerie department, where the associate was more than happy to tell me that I had gone down a band size and needed to buy several new bras.
Then I went to Macy’s and gave up on the shoe department—tons of shoe buyers, two or three very harried shoe salesmen.
I stopped in Sephora, where I was set upon by quite possibly the most hilarious queeny—his word!—makeup artist from Urban Decay ever. And the second I was out of his makeup chair, someone else was in it.
As far as I can tell, things are hopping, shopping-wise.
Then I read something like Kevin Drum’s entry today about real consumer spending, and it’s like, Whoa.
I don’t know whether the Silicon Valley is on the tail end of the dragon. Whether this ripple is spreading over the economy (starting in Detroit, maybe?) and is headed our way with a vengeance. But while there are plenty of sale signs in the windows, I haven’t seen anything like the sign one Tweeter I follow reported:
A local business is, as of today, 11/11/2008, displaying a sign out front which reads (& I am not making this up): AFTER CHRISTMAS SALE NOW
I did walk around the downtown area of my little town, and a couple of businesses are closing. But at the moment it doesn’t seem like a crazy amount. One storefront has been empty for a while—used to be a Sharper Image; remember not to go crazy with the gift cards this year—but it’s going to be an American Apparel soon. A couple of storefronts already have up signs about the next businesses moving in.
Then I read, via Hilzoy, an account in the Financial Times about what’s happened to Iceland. And how it’s spreading.
And I’m like, WTF?
I have no idea where this economy is going. I understand the need to bailout the automakers, despite the fact that they make crappy cars that no one buys. I don’t know what Hank Paulson is doing with that slush fund the Senate couldn’t wait to vote him a couple of weeks ago, and no one else does either. Oil is back down to the mid-50s, apparently because of the world recession. Or because of speculation. Or because…
Jesus, I’ve never felt this blog was so aptly named before.
The only thing I know is that I still need shoes. Of course, I don’t want to regret buying them a year from now when we’re trying to buy milk.
*It occurred to me a day after posting that in fact I did buy some shoes last year when I went to the writers and agents conference in November. But they totally f’d up my left foot and I never wear them any more. Management regrets the error.
November 3, 2008
Like everyone else, I am waiting for tomorrow to be OVER already. All Presidential elections are horrible, each in its own unique way. This one has stretched the limits of human credulity with its uniqueness—if you can’t remember for yourself, an artist has summed it up for us.
We haven’t had much to talk about this election. Actually, despite thinking for years I’d have been a Republican if Republicans were still like Ike, I’ve never ever liked any of the Republicans running for office that I can remember. I’ve always thought the other guy should win. It was years before I put two and two together and said, “Hey, there’s a name for someone who always likes the other guy.” I remember in 1988 my college roommate trying to decide between Bush the Elder and Dukakis and I said, “Supreme Court,” and that summed it up for me. Seriously, there was a choice? Please.
There’s only been one conversation my friends and I have had about this election, and it’s always pretty much begun the same way:
Did you ever think…
There’s nothing else to be said. We know which way that conversation is going. We’re all in our 30s and 40s and we all shake our heads. “Nope, we didn’t ever think it could happen. Not in our lifetimes.”
I remember thinking this election was over months ago, because there was no damn way the US was going to vote for the black guy. I was amazed for weeks as Obama stayed ahead. And the gap started growing.
(I know there have been jokes about movie Presidents like Morgan Freeman or TV Presidents like Dennis Haysbert preparing us for this moment—possibly the only good thing 24 has ever given us—but I would like to remind everyone that SF Chronicle columnist Jon Carroll actually prepared us for this much earlier, in a column he did about a million years ago. He said that one of the problems we have in the US is that our Head of State and Head of Government are the same guy. Other places they split them into President and Prime Minister, Prime Minister and Queen, Governor of Texas and Lieutenant Governor of Texas… so Carroll proposed we have a President and a Captainkirk, someone steady to guide us during troubled times, and he nominated James Earl Jones as the first Captainkirk. This was a column from pre-Web days—yes, children, there was such a time—so I can’t find a link. But he said this, he did.)
I don’t think any of the Republicans could have pulled this one out. (”Imagine the heads exploding if it had come down to the black guy versus the Mormon.”) Maybe it’s just the economy. Maybe it’s just Republican fatigue. But I don’t think so. It really seems people have been responding to a message of, “We’re all in this together,” and not “Aiiieee! The other is coming! Everybody freak out now!” which has been the standard Republican mantra for years now.
I’m not a big fan of Obama—one word: FISA; another couple of words: no Bush prosecutions—but the perfect is the enemy of the good and it’s not, in fact, all about me. I have plenty of Obamaniac friends and their enthusiasm will have to do. I indicated my enthusiasm with political donations. We’re all going to be in Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride for the next couple of years, and in the words of the ancient Chinese urban legend, get ready for your heaping share of Danger + Opportunity galore.
Oh, and this tax plan Obama’s proposed? I plugged our family’s numbers into it, and we get a tax cut. Let me repeat that: WE get a tax cut. If we’re getting a tax cut, I don’t want to hear one goddamn whingeing word out of your mouth about fears of your taxes going up, okay? If your taxes are going up, trust me: you can afford it. So just shut the hell up, fasten your seatbelt, and thank your personal deity you have the money to be taxed.
October 8, 2008
Can anyone get Chevy Chase onto Weekend Update to say: “This just in: Barack Obama is still black!”
That should make it easier on the McCain/Palin crowd.
October 2, 2008
I won’t be able to watch the VP Debate—I’m going to be working over at the Foothill New Works Festival (seats still available!). If you’re going to be watching the debates and making a drinking game out of it, you need to prepare ahead of time, however. So here are a few ideas:
The Number One Rule: More important than having lots of coffee on hand, have lots of water available, to flush the alcohol out of your system. All coffee does is make you a wide-awake drunk.
Now, on to the game:
If you want to compare Palin to Tina Fey in some way: 1 sip.
If you manage not to say it out loud: 2 sips.
If Gwen Ifill then proceeds to make the same comparison: chug.
If you look at your watch while Biden’s speaking: 1 sip.
If you don’t even wear a watch and you do it anyhow: 1 sip.
If you’re temporarily blinded by the whiteness of Biden’s teeth: 1 sip.
If Palin manages a long answer with no factual content whatsoever: 1 sip.
If Palin manages a long answer with complete sentences: 2 sips.
If McCain comes out on the stage and answers for Palin: chug.
“Experience”: 1 sip.
“Fresh ideas”: 1 sip.
“Amtrak”: 1 sip.
“Bridge to Nowhere”: 2 sips.
(Oh my God — I started listening in my car and I’m just stunned.)
“Maverick”: 1 sip and roll eyes.
“Kids”, “Baseball game”, or “Hockey”: 1 sip and a joke.
“Cut taxes as mayor and/or governor”: Yell loudly, “20 million dollar debt” and/or “Oil company windfall gain!”
September 26, 2008
Obama - “Look” - 1 sip
Mccain - “My friends” - 1 sip
“Change” - jumping jack (to burn off alcohol)
Obama - “Are you f’ing kidding me?” - 2 sips
McCain - “POW” - chug
McCain - out and out lie - 1 sip (trying to pace ourselves)
McCain - mentioning Sarah Palin - 2 sips
Obama - 3 syllable word - 1 sip
“Iraq” - run around the house lift glass, yell
Obama - “John is right” - Diane screams
McCain - “terrorist organizations” - laugh hysterically
McCain - “Look” - 1 sip
Wondering who these corky CNN graders are - 1 sip
McCain - “Miss Congeniality” - 1 sip (max 3 sips)
Obama - induces McCain rage - 1 sip
Obama gets to 50 points with CNN analysts - Craig and Erik jam
McCain - “Maverick” - scream in disbelief
(We are so far behind real-time in this debate and I’m already toasty.)
McCain - mentions where he’s been or who he’s met - drink coffee
McCain - “What Senator Obama doesn’t understand” - throw tissues at TV wish we’d kept track of how many times that one had come up
HE ACTUALLY BROUGHT UP BEING A POW. Unfuckingbelievable.
September 24, 2008
As everyone knows, elections didn’t grind to a halt in 1864 or 1944.
Everyone knows what “suspending the campaign” means, most of the time, anyway. (Is this the only time that it doesn’t necessarily mean “dropping out of the race”?)
This maneuver appears to be directed toward one thing and one thing only: getting McCain out of Friday’s debate. And, by extension, postponing or canceling the Veep debate.
And I think there can really only be one reason to take this kind of PR hit, rather than face a live, unscripted appearance: there is something seriously wrong win John McCain right now. Whether it’s the rumored mild stroke on his left side or the Alzheimers that many people suspect, something massive is up big enough to warrant his campaign going forward with this nonsense about suspending the campaign until the crisis is over.
(Um, weren’t the “fundamentals” sound, last week? Now it’s a campaign stopping crisis?)
Release those damn medical records, McCain.
September 8, 2008
Got an unusual comment from Christina the other day:
You were a joy to read… before twitter. Now, not so much. Seriously, have you not better things to say?
Well, the Twitter is basically a way to have something to say, frankly. I suppose everyone who’d be interested in my tweets have probably added me to their own Twitter lists, so I could probably stop posting them here. (I’m DianePatterson on Twitter, btw, in case you’re looking for me.)
But to answer your question: at the moment I haven’t found a particular raison d’être for this blog. Many of the things I’d like to talk about really aren’t fair for me to talk about much (for instance: my kids—yeah, I know, I win some kind of Mom-points for finally figuring that out) and others are just…well…
(more…)
August 8, 2008
I will care about John Edwards’ affair just as soon as CNN cares to explain to me about the gay male prostitute’s multiple overnight visits to the Bush White House.
May 6, 2008
Because Rupert Murdoch is all about the fair playing field:
A computer hacker has told a US court he was hired by a subsidiary of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation to develop pirating software - but denied trying to breach a rival satellite system.
Christopher Tarnovsky was giving evidence yesterday in a corporate spying case brought against the News Corp subsidiary NDS, which supplies the encryption technology that guards access to the media empire’s satellite services across the world, including BSkyB in the UK.
(Via Dear Author.)
April 18, 2008
An excellent sum up:
Do you think if Barack Obama had left his seriously ill wife after having had multiple affairs, had been a member of the "Keating Five," had had a relationship with a much younger lobbyist that his staff felt the need to try and block, had intervened on behalf of the client of said young lobbyist with a federal agency, had denounced then embraced Jerry Falwell, had denounced then embraced the Bush tax cuts, had confused Shiite with Sunni, had confused Al Qaeda in Iraq with the Mahdi Army, had actively sought the endorsement and appeared on stage with a man who denounced the Catholic Church as a whore, and stated that he knew next to nothing about economics — do you think it’s possible that Obama would have been treated differently by the media than John McCain has been? Possible?
And — this is fun to contemplate — if Michelle Obama had been an adulteress, drug addict thief with a penchant for plagiarism — do you think that she would be subject to slightly different treatment from the media than Cindypills McCain has been? Anyone?
(Via Avedon.)