<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nobody Knows Anything &#187; Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nobody-knows-anything.com/category/language/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nobody-knows-anything.com</link>
	<description>when we analyze art, we ARE enjoying it for what it is, dammit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:19:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Modern terms for women</title>
		<link>http://www.nobody-knows-anything.com/2009/08/modern-terms-for-women.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nobody-knows-anything.com/2009/08/modern-terms-for-women.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobody-knows-anything.com/?p=1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This recent entry by Justine Musk reminded me of the not-especially-novel realization that words to describe women in a derogatory way are a)commonplace, b)much meaner than any similar terms used to describe men, and c)often used as shorthand for, as Musk puts it, &#8220;nuts and sluts.&#8221; And I was reminded of the whole &#8220;nuts and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://moschus.livejournal.com/121582.html">This recent entry by Justine Musk</a> reminded me of the not-especially-novel realization that words to describe women in a derogatory way are a)commonplace, b)much meaner than any similar terms used to describe men, and c)often used as shorthand for, as Musk puts it, &#8220;nuts and sluts.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>And I was reminded of the whole &#8220;nuts and sluts&#8221; defense (although to be fair, this poster left out any suggestion that I was running around having affairs while taking a break from my golddigging, which is a bit surprising when you think about it because clearly I had the time, since the kids are so rarely with me&#8230;.). When you try to tear down a woman you call her: selfish, spoiled/ungrateful, crazy, golddigging, bad mother, slut, whore, fat, ugly. Because these are the worst things a woman can possibly be (which means she&#8217;s supposed to be: selfless, sacrificing, chaste, thin, beautiful, pleasing, and of course &#8216;sane&#8217;, which I suspect often translates to &#8216;not causing any trouble or inconvenience&#8217;, and unspoiled/grateful, ie: &#8216;lacking any bothersome sense of entitlement&#8217;). What is the equivalent for a man? Is there one?
</p></blockquote>
<p>There are no equivalent terms for men. Calling a man a &#8220;bastard&#8221; or &#8220;asshole&#8221; is not the same thing as calling a woman a &#8220;bitch&#8221; or a &#8220;whore&#8221;&mdash;you know the old line: &#8220;Men are assertive, women are aggressive bitches.&#8221; </p>
<p>(My favorite definition of &#8220;whore&#8221; or &#8220;slut&#8221; is &#8220;Someone who&#8217;s had sex with one more person than I have.&#8221; It makes me giggle every time I hear someone use one of those words. Which is good, because it keeps me from slapping them across the face.)</p>
<p>In direct reflection of assertive/bitch: Where a woman is &#8220;pleasing&#8221; or &#8220;friendly,&#8221; a man is probably just a &#8220;pansy.&#8221; Or an even worse p-word (which is, of course, in and of itself a derogatory word meaning <em>woman</em>)? Does anyone really think calling someone a &#8220;dick&#8221; is the same thing as calling them a &#8220;pussy&#8221; or a &#8220;cunt&#8221;? And are those insults have the same impact on men and women alike, or are they considered a greater insult to one sex over the other?</p>
<p>There is no plot to <em>The Devil Wears Prada</em> if the protagonist&#8217;s boss is a male instead of a female. The entire plot of the movie is: The female boss doesn&#8217;t try to make friends with her underling; instead, she treats her underling&#8230;like an underling! And expects the underling to do her fucking job without needing a pat on the head! SHOCK! Was it even possible to relate to Anne Hathaway&#8217;s character&#8217;s sense of entitlement and resentment? Grow the fuck up, honey, and do it NOW.</p>
<p>One of the knocks on Sandra Bullock&#8217;s character in <i>The Proposal</i> is that she doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;Hi&#8221; to the secretary as she goes into the Big Boss&#8217;s office. Wouldn&#8217;t it be considered weird if Important Executive Christian Bale stopped to say &#8220;Hi&#8221; to the secretary simply to be friendly (instead of, say, to get her phone number for a quickie or to insinuate himself for some corporate espionage later)? He&#8217;d be considered completely unserious management material if he stopped to say &#8220;Hi&#8221; to every goddamn secretary he ran across.</p>
<p>(Don&#8217;t even get me started on how <em>The Proposal</em> decides to humanize Sandra Bullock by having her confess that after a fellow executive insulted her, she fired him&#8230;and then went into the bathroom to cry, because her widdle feelings got hurt!)</p>
<p>I know there have been <a href="http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/">female attempts to reclaim the word &#8220;bitch&#8221;</a>, but I think they&#8217;re not as successful as the gay community&#8217;s reclamation of &#8220;queer,&#8221; sadly. &#8220;Bitch&#8221; is still just pejorative.</p>
<p>It all comes down to: <em>She&#8217;s not being nice. Let&#8217;s put her in her place.</em></p>
<p>You know what? Not everyone likes you. They&#8217;re going to call you &#8220;bitch&#8221; and &#8220;ballbuster&#8221; and &#8220;whore&#8221; and whatever else behind your back anyhow. Fuck &#8216;em. But don&#8217;t use any of those words in response. </p>
<p><center>&sect;</center></p>
<p>Ten years ago, during the whole Monica Lewinsky nonsense, I received mail from my high school addressed to &#8220;Miss Diane Patterson.&#8221; My exclusive all-girls Catholic high school, which had always drilled into me the importance of relying on myself, which <i>assumed</i> I was going to college and not going off to get married immediately, which had always placed the emphasis on seeing me as the most important person in my life&#8230;was referring to me as &#8220;Miss.&#8221; </p>
<p>I wrote a letter to the school&#8217;s principal, who had also been one of my teachers while I was there, and said, &#8220;Could you add a form of address to your database that doesn&#8217;t rely on my relationship to a man?&#8221; </p>
<p>I am happy to report every mailing I&#8217;ve gotten since has been to &#8220;Ms. Diane Patterson,&#8221; if not just &#8220;Diane Patterson.&#8221; </p>
<p>There is no excuse for using the term &#8220;Miss&#8221; for a woman over 18. I&#8217;m sorry, there just isn&#8217;t. My marital status is none of your damn business; if you need to know, you can ask. It&#8217;s not more polite, it&#8217;s not better etiquette, it&#8217;s just a way of filing a woman into the &#8220;available&#8221; category. </p>
<p><center>&sect;</center></p>
<p>A year ago I was lying around the pool at Club Swanky, envying the mothers walking by who were wearing bikinis, whereas I felt like a big fat slug. The terms &#8220;MILF&#8221; and &#8220;trophy wives&#8221; came to mind, and I immediately found myself asking:</p>
<p>&#8220;Who&#8217;s the &#8216;I&#8217; in that term&#8221;</p>
<p>and </p>
<p>&#8220;Whose trophy, precisely?&#8221;</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s my new favorite term: &#8220;cougar.&#8221; Which leads us to the question: &#8220;Too old for sex with WHOM?&#8221; </p>
<p>These are all words describing a woman solely in terms of her relationship to a man&mdash;and simply a sexual relationship at that. Who does she belong to? Whose life is she improving simply by existing? Who is she too old for? There&#8217;s nothing about her qualities, what makes her an individual, anything about her experiences or hopes and dreams&#8230; Nope, it&#8217;s all about who she&#8217;s servicing sexually.</p>
<p>If you use them, please stop. You&#8217;re just promoting the idea that women are nothing more than plastic play dolls, serving the same purpose and as interchangeable. </p>
<p><center>&sect;</center></p>
<p>Man, you&#8217;d think something had happened to me recently to bring this rant on. Actually, things are really great&mdash;stressful, with the upcoming move and all, but overall fine. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nobody-knows-anything.com/2009/08/modern-terms-for-women.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
